Demand Parity for Flat Closure – Amend the WHCRA


A new project at Not Putting on a Shirt

Sign the petition or write a letter to your legislators!


What is the WHCRA?

The Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act (WHCRA) is national legislation passed in 1998 which required most insurance companies to cover breast mound reconstruction (BMR) after mastectomy, surgery and reconstruction of the other breast to produce a symmetrical appearance, breast prostheses, and treatment of physical complications of the mastectomy. But there’s a catch.


What the WHCRA didn’t cover, was flat closure.

In the 1990’s, less than 20% of mastectomy patients elected BMR. Flat closure was the default, but it didn’t have a name – it was just “a mastectomy without reconstruction.”

Since there’s a near complete lack of data on patient satisfaction with flat closure aesthetics, we can’t say for sure whether flat closure quality has declined as BMR rates have soared – currently hovering at around half of all patients electing BMR. Certainly, anecdotal evidence would suggest that it has. But we do know that right now, at least 1/4 of women going flat are dissatisfied with their aesthetic result, and 1 in 20 are intentionally denied a flat closure.

We also know anecdotally that women frequently encounter insurance denials of coverage for flat closure and revision services. And we know that when insurance companies were denying coverage for BMR, patient advocates fought to pass the WHCRA… and that solved that problem.


The next step is obvious – amend the WHCRA to include coverage for flat closure and revision services!

Why do we need to amend the WHCRA?

To ensure insurance coverage for flat closure and revision services… so that women going flat don’t have to worry about fighting their insurance companies.

Aesthetic flat closure is not too much to ask.

Too often, if the option to go flat is mentioned at all in the surgical consult, it’s cast as a choice that’s “less than.” Most of the time, the idea of an aesthetic plastics closure isn’t even entertained for women going flat… whereas it is routine for women electing BMR.

In terms of getting revision surgery to achieve an aesthetic result they can live with, many women simply don’t have the ability to fight their insurance company during their recovery – so they are forced to live with a “mangled” chest. Whereas their sisters who choose breast reconstruction have their two, three, even up to nine or more surgeries covered by insurance without any suggestion that their surgeries are “cosmetic”.


Without corrective action, this disparity will endure.

The original intent of the WHCRA was to ensure that women facing breast cancer surgery were able to achieve aesthetic results they could live with. Who could have forseen that helping women who choose breast reconstruction would end up harming the rest who choose to go flat? Without corrective action, this disparity will endure.

Flat closure does not rebuild the shape of the breast, but it DOES correct a deformity caused by the mastectomy – it restores the normal anatomic contour of the chest wall (hence, “chest wall reconstruction”) – and therefore it is truly reconstructive (NOT cosmetic).


Our proposed amendment

It’s clear, from a reading of the WHCRA text, why flat closure is often interpreted as being excluded from coverage. However, this is an easy thing to fix – we simply need to change “breast” reconstruction in the legislation to “breast or chest wall” reconstruction. It’s that simple!

“… who elects either breast or chest wall reconstruction in connection with such mastectomy, coverage for— all stages of reconstruction of the breast or chest wall on which the mastectomy has been performed; surgery and reconstruction of the other breast or chest wall to produce a symmetrical appearance…”

Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998

Amending the WHCRA is critical to ensure parity.

One in eight women will face a breast cancer diagnosis in their lifetime. And four out of five women over the age of 60 who have mastectomies, decide to go flat. That’s a lot of women potentially facing suboptimal care and additional hardship at one of the most vulnerable times in their lives.

Amending the WHCRA to include insurance coverage for flat closure (chest wall reconstruction) will be a critical step in ensuring these women receive the care they deserve.


Questions or Comments?

Tell us what you think.

Want to Help?

Sign the Petition or Write a Letter to Your Legislators!

Cleveland Clinic Researchers Publish Paper on Aesthetic Flat Closure

CREDIT: Djohan et. al. (The Breast Journal)
DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13641
You read that right. Cleveland Clinic researchers, in partnership with the University of Toledo, have been researching flat closure.
Cleveland Clinic y’all.

This week in research to #putflatonthemenu … a collaborative paper from researchers out of the The University of Toledo and Cleveland Clinic just published their aesthetic approach to flat closure in The Breast Journal, entitled “Technical considerations in nonreconstructive mastectomy patients”

“When performing post‐mastectomy closure without reconstruction, attention to tissue excess, medialization of axillary tissue and providing bulk with lateral and caudal tissue allows for an easy, reproducible, and aesthetic closure.”

– (Conclusion) Djohan et. al. 2019
What Does This Mean? We are Being Heard.

Beyond the technical impact of this research… the fact that researchers are actively pursuing this means that flat advocacy is making an impact. We are being heard. The medical community is realizing that women going flat expect better – we expect our choice to be honored, and we expect the same respect and consideration for our aesthetic result that women who choose breast mound recon are afforded.

Thank you, Cleveland Clinic researchers! Thank you for listening to women going flat, for taking our concerns seriously, and for putting your professional skills to use on our behalf.
Michelle Djohan MS
Rebecca Knackstedt MD, PhD
Tripp Leavitt MD
Risal Djohan MD
Stephen Grobmyer MD

Original version published on NPOAS’ Facebook page on October 27, 2019

FDA Issues Landmark Recommendations for Implant Manufacturers

Hot off the press – FDA is listening to women’s voices on breast implants. Today, FDA issued a recommendation to implant manufacturers that include many of the items that Breast Implant Safety Alliance and others have been pushing for:

  • a black box warning to clearly identify risks (this is the most serious warning labeling the FDA has in its toolkit)
  • a checklist to guide the patient-provider discussion
  • new screening guidelines for possible ruptures
  • clear ingredient information

This is about full disclose of a woman’s reconstructive options (this MUST include flat closure) as well as full information about the risks associated with each of those options. We applaud FDA for taking this important step and we extend our sincere gratitude to the explant advocates who have worked tirelessly at their own expense to be a voice for women on this issue.

#fierceflatforward
#putflatonthemenu

Original version published on NPOAS’ Facebook page on October 23, 2019

NPOAS Will Have a Poster Presentation at SABCS 2019

Big news! NPOAS will be presenting a research poster at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium this year, December 10th – 14th. The poster is entitled “Flat closure after mastectomy: are your patients satisfied with the results?”

This poster will weave together results from both of our ad-hoc surveys, and will be a springboard for encouraging researchers in the field to do larger-scale studies with validated tools.

We have our eye on the Breast-Q, an outstanding assessment tool developed by Dr. Andrea Pusic, the President of the Plastic Surgery Foundation, the nonprofit arm of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS).

Learn more about our work.

#cantstopwontstop
#putflatonthemenu
#notputtingonashirt
#SABCS2019

Original version published on NPOAS’ Facebook page on October 20, 2019

Plastic Surgeons Are NOT Required to Discuss Aesthetic Flat Closure

It’s true… plastic surgeons are not required to discuss aesthetic flat closure during the reconstructive consult.
Christy Avila on International FLAT Day

Christy Avila of Fierce, Flat, Forward was just interviewed by patient safety watchdog blog MedTruth about going flat. Christy makes the excellent point that plastic surgeons are not required to discuss flat closure during the reconstructive consult – so oftentimes women don’t realize that going flat is even an option. She’s spot on! Click below to read the article.

What can we do about it?

NPOAS is addressing the problem of patients not receiving full disclosure of their options.

Late last year, we published “The Future of NPOAS” which outlined our strategic plan. This plan includes legislative and governmental initiatives to pursue systemic change to promote parity for flat closure, and one of the amendment targets is the NAPBC‘s plastic surgery reconstructive consult requirements protocol (see below).

Flat closure should be REQUIRED to be discussed alongside breast mound reconstructive options!

The National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers’ reconstruction consult requirements can be amended to include aesthetic flat closure at the fourth option.

Watch MedTruth’s interview with Breast Implant Safety Alliance‘s VP Julie Lykins:

Original version published on NPOAS’ Facebook page on October 18, 2019